[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Gazette - Issue 13
|
From: |
John Cowan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Gazette - Issue 13 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:35:17 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
> > A new `equal=?` procedure was added, which works like `equal?` except
> > that it ignores exactness when comparing numbers.
>
> So, which version is NOT R5RS compliant?
`equal?` is R5RS compliant. `equal=?` is not mentioned in R5RS, so it's
also R5RS compliant by default.
--
Principles. You can't say A is John Cowan <address@hidden>
made of B or vice versa. All mass http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
is interaction. --Richard Feynman