[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] llvm-gcc / clang
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] llvm-gcc / clang |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:35:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Felix scripsit:
> Oh, and clang gave me stupid warnings that where actually wrong
> (an "x == x" comparison of floats to detect NaN, which is IMHO
> totally correct, triggers a warning - but I'm sure John can give
> us the correct interpretation of the standard C semantics).
ISO C doesn't require support for NaNs.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions.
Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about
to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler