Re: [Chicken-users] coops

[schugk]

> This reflects the way scheme sees lists, which are build of pairs:

Jeha, i know. A list is a pair, but a pair is not a list. Therefore a  
list should be a subclass of pair. (Ok, for '() we have <null>).

And the other point is, that i can not specialized generic procedures  
for <pair> and <list>. Maybe it is intended (?).

Thanks
Sandro