[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] EQV? and NaN
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] EQV? and NaN |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:04:09 +0200 (CEST) |
From: John Cowan <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] EQV? and NaN
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:58:09 -0400
> Felix scripsit:
>
>> "(eqv? +nan +nan)" being #t would mean violation of R5RS.
>
> Technically, yes. But R5RS didn't anticipate the strange behavior of
> NaN. Furthermore, the discrepancy doesn't seem to bother the developers
> and users of Gauche, Gambit, Bigloo, Kawa, Scheme48, Chibi, or STklos,
> all of which are R5RS systems.
Just for the record, and to spare you the typing: I generally don't care
what all of those systems do. The only authorities that I find acceptable
are R5RS, common sense, performance and convenience.
cheers,
felix
Re: [Chicken-users] EQV? and NaN, Aleksej Saushev, 2011/07/13