[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] sorted? bug?
From: |
Paul Colby |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] sorted? bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:13:39 -0700 |
Hi,
I noticed what I feel is an incorrect behavior for the function sorted?
My understanding is that (sorted? list test) should return #t if pairwise
the elements of list (test e-n e-n+1) is true for all n. However, I get
the following I think rather odd behavior using 4.7.0 interpreted,
(sorted? '(1 2 3) < ) is #t. good so far
(sorted? '(1 1 3) <) is #t but should be #f since (< 1 1) is #f
(sorted? '(1 1 3) <=) is #f but should be #t since (<= 1 1) is #t
Am I missing something?
BTW- Chicken is truly awesome !!!
Thanks
Paul Colby
- [Chicken-users] sorted? bug?,
Paul Colby <=