[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment
From: |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:29:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2011 08:40 AM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>
>
> Good point, I did not think to check where these eggs are hosted. So
> here is the revised list; I have marked the eggs not hosted on
> call-cc.org with an asterisk (*) and I advise their respective authors
> to correct the categories. And yes, changing the category would also
> necessitate tagging a new release for each egg.
>
> -Ivan
>
>
> Eggs in "Uncategorized or invalid category":
>
> aes -> Cryptography
> crypto-tools -> Cryptography
I've done these, just not tagged a new version yet, so it's still
showing them as invalid! (I put them in "crypto" when it should have
been "crypt"...)
ABS
- --
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6URK0ACgkQRgz/WHNxCGpPBgCdFzYDTEO1UuaPuFfD45PBebX8
4bYAnjMK8P1XyH+tqmPZhS4878j1/HeU
=0NtW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment, Peter Bex, 2011/10/11