Re: [Chicken-users] R7RS large library aliases

[John Cowan]

Sounds good to me! 

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:23 AM Peter <address@hidden> wrote:

> The trouble is that the SRFIs are finalized before we know which ones will
> become part of R7RS-large, in some cases decades before.  Currently the
> SRFI process doesn't allow correcting anything except outright errors of an
> editorial nature, except in extremely rare cases.

I know, I just mean that chicken should add an additional

(define-library (scheme list)
  (import (srfi :1))
  (export ...))

somewhere in the srfi-1 egg (or core, depending on where the srfi is
actually implemented). All other Schemes should do the same, so that we
can actually *use* the new names portably :-/