[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConne
From: |
Archie Cobbs |
Subject: |
Re: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection() |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:31:01 -0500 (CDT) |
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Static initializers are quite expensive, so we should try to limit
> them as much as reasonable.
I'm curious about what you mean exactly by this statement..
Obviously, we should avoid executing static initializers whose result
isn't going to be used, so "on demand" initialization is usually better.
Otherwise, there doesn't seem to me to be any reason why code should
be more expensive to execute in a static initializer than outside
of one.. is that what you're implying? If so, why, and wouldn't those
reasons be dependent on the particular VM being used?
Thanks,
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/09
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/09
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/09
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/09
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/10
- RE: [cp-patches] Patch: support for reading directories viaURL.openConnection(), Jeroen Frijters, 2004/09/10