[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cp-patches] Re: RFC: Reduce number of split-for-gcj lists
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
[cp-patches] Re: RFC: Reduce number of split-for-gcj lists |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:05:01 +0200 |
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 18:48 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Mark> It does mean a change in any of the deeply nested packages triggers
> Mark> re-compilation of a few more files in its 'parent-package'. But I feel
> Mark> the overall compile time reduction is worth it.
>
> Does it noticeably impact memory use? One reason we did the splitting
> this way rather than all-at-once was that some compilations used an
> excessive amount of memory.
Not noticeably on my machine (it does when I reduce it to just 2 levels,
then swing takes up a lot of memory - it does slashes compile time in
half again...). But my dev-machine has lots of memory. I can explicitly
try on one with much less memory later this week.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part