classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: java.security.Security proposal


From: Brian Jones
Subject: Re: java.security.Security proposal
Date: 17 Oct 2001 17:45:07 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7

"Anthony Green" <address@hidden> writes:

> Brian wrote:
> > I apologize for not having read that link yet, but how does changing
> > the name to gcj.security have to do with fixing a bug?  Is this really
> > gcj specific?
> 
> It's possible to have an installation with native shared library
> providers and no .jar implementation.  You really don't want to have
> a global classpath.security file in this case because gcj is the
> only implementation that will find and use those providers.

I'm not very familiar with Java's security framework here so I'll take
your word for it.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]