[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simple Proposal

From: Etienne M. Gagnon
Subject: Re: Simple Proposal
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 11:42:29 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011023

Chris Gray wrote:

Does "everybody" have to include RMS, and does
represent his current position?

I can't speak for RMS, but he already agree to the CURRENT Classpath GNU+exc license, which is much weaker than the LGPL. So, apparently, he agrees that the non-AWT code falls into the category that does not require full "pure GPL" protection.

Of course, my proposal is for the non-AWT code. I do not want to do the battle for the AWT license (others can do it;-).

Etienne M. Gagnon          

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]