Re: [Kissme-general] Re: Proposal for changes to Classpath's JNI libraries

[Stephen Crawley]

> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:49:56PM +1000, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> > [Besides, it is not clear that it matters much to anyone right now.  The
> > current releases of Classpath, GCJ and Kissme >>all<< have JNI function
> > vectors that are incompatible with JNI 1.0.  The fact that nobody noticed
> > until now tells me something about the relative importance of these things.]
> 
> Have you looked at SableVM?  It also uses Classpath/JNI.  Please do
> not assume that because Kissme/GCJ are incorrect all other VMs are.

It appears that the problem is that different editions of the Sun JNI
1.1 documentation define the DefineClass with different signatures!!

> Also, please make sure that all you Kissme specific changes to
> Classpath are well hidden by #ifdef directives.

They are.

-- Steve