[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes'
From: |
Chris Gray |
Subject: |
RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes' |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:48:56 +0100 (CET) |
On 1 Mar 2003, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Maybe we should just take the TeX approach and just converge to some
> non-rational number like e, so we can say that we are now at version
> 2.7182 :)
Hm, I think e is already taken by LaTeX. What else is there? (Apart from i
:>).
--
Chris Gray
VM Architect, ACUNIA
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes',
Chris Gray <=
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Jeroen Frijters, 2003/03/02
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Archie Cobbs, 2003/03/03