classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Query on stacktrace management logic


From: Jeroen Frijters
Subject: RE: Query on stacktrace management logic
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:17:45 +0100

Patrik Reali wrote:
> --On Freitag, 5. März 2004 08:13 +1000 David Holmes 
> <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
> > As previously mentioned I think VMClass would be better defined as a
> > helper with static methods rather than a shadow object 
> attached to each
> > Class instance.
> 
> >From my own experience, I can only agree with this...
> 
> (not much to say, but I really wanted to say it)

Since I seem to be the only one that actually wants a VMClass instance, maybe 
we can agree on a slightly different interface. How about keep a reference to a 
VMClass instance in Class, but not calling any instance methods on VMClass, but 
using static methods instead (always passing the Class reference along).

Does that make sense?

Regards,
Jeroen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]