[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs #7123, Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs #7123, Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:19:24 +0000 |
Sascha Brawer writes:
> any opinions about what to do about Classpath Bug #7123?
>
> Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=7123
>
> Would it be correct to amend the API documentation, saying that correct
> results cannot be expected for input coefficients that have no exact
> representation in IEEE 754?
Ideally gcj should provide a way to avoid the use of extended 80-bit
precision on the x86.
--
Brian Gough
- Bugs #7123, Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic, Sascha Brawer, 2004/03/15
- Re: Bugs #7123, Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic, Stephen Crawley, 2004/03/15
- Dumb build error, Adam Young, 2004/03/15
- Re: Dumb build error, Mark Wielaard, 2004/03/16
- Re: Dumb build error, Michael Koch, 2004/03/16
- Re: Dumb build error, Adam Young, 2004/03/16
- Re: Dumb build error, Mark Wielaard, 2004/03/17
- Re: Dumb build error, Michael Koch, 2004/03/17
Re: Bugs #7123, Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic,
Brian Gough <=