[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ServiceFactory
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: ServiceFactory |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:15:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Am Montag, 22. März 2004 10:00 schrieb Sascha Brawer:
> Sascha Brawer <address@hidden> wrote on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:05:55
+0100:
> > [loading service providers from "META-INF/services/*" in external
> > JARs] 2. Which namespace?
> >3. The unit tests (see attached ForMauve.tar.gz) run checks on
> >gnu.classpath.ServiceFactory. This seems a bit unclean, since Mauve
> > was once meant to be independent of Classpath. A possibility would
> > be to change the tests so that they check the public API
> >javax.imageio.spi.ServiceRegistry.lookupProviders
>
> Since there seem to be no objects with respect to the gnu.classpath
> namespace, I'll commit gnu.classpath.ServiceFactory this Wednesday.
Tom said on IRC that there was never talked about this yet.
> The Mauve tests, which I'll also commit on Wednesday, will run checks
> on the public API javax.imageio.spi.ServiceRegistry.lookupProviders,
> not on something specific to Classpath. Thus, I'll also commit a
> mostly stubbed javax.imageio.spi.ServiceRegistry, whose only
> implemented method will be lookupProviders.
>
> Please tell me by Tuesday in case you don't agree.
Perhaps you should give us all some more time until Tom responded.
Personally I think its bad because Mauve has a more general target (in
principle).
Michael
Re: ServiceFactory, Sascha Brawer, 2004/03/22