[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance
From: |
Miguel de Icaza |
Subject: |
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:02:06 -0400 |
Hello,
> Because you didn't mention the key advantage that you get from
> AOT-compiled shared libraries: saving memory from sharing library code
> between processes. You're only two points were about saving time and
> memory from not having to JIT compile code.
Ah, that is correct, and I had at least completely ignored that fact.
Using --aot will indeed use shared mapping between various Mono
processes, so it is an extra advantage.
Miguel
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, (continued)
- RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/13
- RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Stuart Ballard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jonathan Pryor, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Anthony Green, 2004/04/14
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jonathan Pryor, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Anthony Green, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance,
Miguel de Icaza <=
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Miguel de Icaza, 2004/04/14