[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Target native layer
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: Target native layer |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:22:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 14:10 schrieb Dr. Torsten Rupp:
> I first wanted to avoid to offer here things in advance (otherwise
> I fear somebody will become upset if I can not do it in time,
> because of limitated manpower). Currently on the list is: Solaris,
> RTEMS, embOS and MinGW (Windows). Please do not ask me exactly
> _when_ I will supply this, but I promise I will do my best to add
> these as soon as possible.
That sounds great. Can you just post the code without added to CVS ?
This way we can at least look at it. We should discuss all before
commiting to CVS anyway.
> By the way: I think "Linux" is not mis-named, because it is
> "Linux". It is only a "coincidence" that is 100% identical to the
> generic case. The background is: we are developing basically with
> Linux.
Its a difference if code is target for Linux only or if its developed
on Linux only. You use only Linux for it. Roman use it on FreeBSD.
I use this code on NetBSD too. I have access to Solaris machines and
they want to use this code too. So in fact is not Linux anymore, its
Posix.
Michael
> Sincerly,
>
> Torsten
- Target native layer, Dr. Torsten Rupp, 2004/08/10
- Re: Target native layer, Mark Wielaard, 2004/08/10
- Re: Target native layer, Roman Kennke, 2004/08/10
- Re: Target native layer, Dr. Torsten Rupp, 2004/08/11
- Re: Target native layer, Michael Koch, 2004/08/11
- Re: Target native layer, Dr. Torsten Rupp, 2004/08/12
- Re: Target native layer, Michael Koch, 2004/08/12
- Re: Target native layer, Dr. Torsten Rupp, 2004/08/12
- Re: Target native layer,
Michael Koch <=