[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores
From: |
Archie Cobbs |
Subject: |
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:18:02 -0500 (CDT) |
Sven de Marothy wrote:
> > If the strtod in glibc is threadsafe *and* accurate, then we should
> > probably use it, at least as a default.
>
> Dalibor Topic said on IRC that it has some problems on Irix. So it might
> not be a good idea. So perhaps adding a special case would be best, or
> you could solve it upstream by adding support for NaN and infinity to
> newlib.
Not everybody uses Linux, so what glibc does is not entirely relevant..
I'd prefer a 100% Java implementation, but that's probably a lot of work.
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
- RE: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores,
Archie Cobbs <=
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Archie Cobbs, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Chris Pickett, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/08
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Robert Schuster, 2004/10/07