[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:52:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
Am Donnerstag, 6. Januar 2005 16:43 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 6. Januar 2005 16:26 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
> > > Robert Schuster wrote:
> > > > Which Free Java VMs support the GetDirectBufferAddress() in a
> > > > way that it returns a real buffer address instead of NULL?
> > >
> > > IKVM supports it (it supports all 1.4 JNI functions).
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > Have you made sure it works ? The java part in current GNU
> > classpath is buggy and doesn't work. I have a patch for this. It
> > will get in after the upcoming release.
>
> I have a very simple testcase for the GetDirect* functions that
> seems to work. What exactly is the problem with the classpath part?
It only works correctly for direct buffers but its valid to give any
type of view on the direct buffer to these methods.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
- VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Robert Schuster, 2005/01/06
- Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Michael Koch, 2005/01/06
- Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Archie Cobbs, 2005/01/06
- Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Guilhem Lavaux, 2005/01/06
- Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Robert Lougher, 2005/01/06
- Re: VM support for GetDirectBufferAddress, Stephen Crawley, 2005/01/06