[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:24:37 +0200 |
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Which is the Right Answer: the caller of baz *is* Frob.
It *may* be the right answer, but how can you be certain that the coder of
class Foo intended this? IMNSHO, code like this is completely unauditable
(remember, this isn't just a correctness issue, access to class loaders is a
potential security issue).
Regards,
Jeroen
- Re: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, (continued)
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/07/25
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/07/25
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/07/25
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker,
Jeroen Frijters <=
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/07/25
RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/07/25