[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mauve comparison with tgolem
From: |
Edwin Steiner |
Subject: |
Re: mauve comparison with tgolem |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:00:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Edwin" == Edwin Steiner <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Edwin> Yes. All our machines are headless, so there is no X display. We are
> Edwin> pondering to use a virtual X server, but we don't have a real
> Edwin> solution right now. Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Take a look at the batch_run script in Mauve. It already has all the
> code needed to run the tests against the Xvfb server.
Thanks, looks good. Xvnc might also be an option. Now we just have to
get our sysadmin to install one or the other and X-dev packages on each
machine. Some convincing to do... :)
-Edwin
- mauve comparison with tgolem, Christian Thalinger, 2005/11/22
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Mark Wielaard, 2005/11/25
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Edwin Steiner, 2005/11/25
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Mark Wielaard, 2005/11/25
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Edwin Steiner, 2005/11/28
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Mark Wielaard, 2005/11/29
- Re: mauve comparison with tgolem, Christian Thalinger, 2005/11/30