[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:28:32 +0000 |
Archie Cobbs <address@hidden> writes:
> For example, all of Apache is on a single Subversion server
> and they're up to revision #356264 (including imported CVS commits).
> We've used it at my real job for over a year with zero problems.
>
> As far as being "supported", not sure what you're referring to.
> Everything I've ever wanted to do with CVS I can do with SVN, plus
> a lot more.
Subversion seems to be another of those gnu vs apache things.
gnu people *tend* to prefer CVS (and to a lesser extent arch) because
they offer more centralized control. CVS is most popular because it is
very stable and well understood.
Nic
- lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/11
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/11
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Archie Cobbs, 2005/12/11
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Archie Cobbs, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Tom Tromey, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Andrew Pinski, 2005/12/13
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Per Bothner, 2005/12/12
- Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Andrew Haley, 2005/12/12
Re: lists.gnu.org and savannah.gnu.org (CVS) updates, Tom Tromey, 2005/12/12