classpathx-javamail
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Classpathx-javamail] [Fwd: Re: [JPackage-discuss] Re: Status of classpa


From: Fernando Nasser
Subject: [Classpathx-javamail] [Fwd: Re: [JPackage-discuss] Re: Status of classpathx-mail, classpath-inetlib, gnu-crypto]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:54:04 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Chris,

We need to get this solved so we can get javamail  (and jaf) on Fedora as
replacements for the non-open source ones.

Would it be possible to have a procedure of regularly importing inetlib sources and changing the packages with a script so we have a self contained javamail?

It would still be using inetlib, so not duplicating development. It would only give us a little bit of work here and there. I believe that with CVS and vendor branch imports we can actually do this conversion only once (except for new files).

Regards,
Fernando




P.S.: We have no problems in distributing gnucrypto on Fedora (the same is not true for jpackage.org but their packages are mainly intended for Red Hat based systems anyway). I believe Debian is also OK with distributing GNU Crypto.






-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [JPackage-discuss] Re: Status of classpathx-mail, classpath-inetlib, gnu-crypto
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:32:07 +0300
From: Ville Skyttä <address@hidden>
Reply-To: Discussion about JPackage project <address@hidden>
To: Discussion about JPackage project <address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>

On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 21:26, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> One new detail: classpathx-mail cannot be used as a drop-in replacement
> for javamail due to its dependency on inetlib. Sorry Ville, I am not sure I understood. Wouldn't it be that as long as someone has the inetlib package then they could install classpathx-mail as a replacement for javamail?

No, merely installing inetlib is not enough (and it's already taken care
of with the rpm dependency).  It needs to be included in CLASSPATH one
way or another too when using classpathx-mail.

_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]