commit-classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[commit-cp] [bugs #7939] String comparisons that use == or != instead of


From: Andrew John Hughes
Subject: [commit-cp] [bugs #7939] String comparisons that use == or != instead of equals()
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:37:19 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Epiphany/1.0.8

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: classpath.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #7939] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Andrew John Hughes <address@hidden>
'Date: 
                Thu 12/30/2004 at 00:10 (GMT)

------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
In java.util.Locale, strings are interned so == can be used.






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #7939] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=7939>
Project: classpath
Submitted by: 0
On: Sun 02/29/2004 at 05:33

Category:  None
Severity:  5 - Average
Resolution:  Fixed
Privacy:  Public
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Closed
Platform Version:  None


Summary:  String comparisons that use == or != instead of equals()

Original Submission:  The following lines perform comparisons with String 
literals using == or != instead of equals(). This is not guaranteed to produce 
the proper results when the Strings are equal but not the exact same object. 

gnu/java/net/protocol/jar/Handler.java : 102
java/net/URLStreamHandler.java : 407
java/nio/ByteOrder.java : 55
java/util/Locale.java : 439
java/util/Locale.java : 475


Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 12/30/2004 at 00:10       By: Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew>
In java.util.Locale, strings are interned so == can be used.

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 03/12/2004 at 12:44       By: Mark Wielaard <mark>
I believe all this issues have been fixed now.
In the future it helps to include a real patch and/or point out the precise 
version of the file in question.












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=7939>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]