Re: 8.21.2-c53c - failure on rm/deep-2 and du/long-from-unreadable

[Bernhard Voelker]

On 02/19/2013 01:10 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 11:27 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
>> So ecrypts limits NAME_MAX. Indeed, running the perl snippet with $dir
>> set to 142 works.
> 
> OK I'll take the simple approach and skip those tests in that case.
> Patch attached.

Hi Padraig,

two places with the same check ... wouldn't it be nice to wrap it into
a "require_name_max_" or even use "require_name_max_ 200"?

Apart from that:
+1

Have a nice day,
Berny