coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: require_ulimit_v_(): tests skipped with enable-single-binary


From: Pádraig Brady
Subject: Re: require_ulimit_v_(): tests skipped with enable-single-binary
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:56:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

On 21/09/15 00:47, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>>From 1335ab2713aab020564275c49fdb3e92bb9a207b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bernhard Voelker <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:40:33 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] maint: use adaptive approach for `ulimit -v` based tests
> 
> When configured with either 'symlinks' or 'shebangs' as value for
> the --enable-single-binary option, tests based on `ulimit -v` are
> skipped.  The reason is that the multicall 'coreutils' binary requires
> much more memory due to shared libraries being loaded, and the size of
> the 'date' binary (~290KiB) compared to the multicall binary (~5MiB),
> of course.  Finally, in the case of 'shebangs', the starting shell
> requires more memory, too
> 
> Instead of using hard-coded values for the memory limit, use an
> adaptive approach: first determine the amount of memory for a similar,
> yet more trivial command, and then do the real test run using that

s/command/invocation of the command/

I can't find any significant issues with the patch at all.

In future for i18n significant `ulimit -v`, we might have gen_min_ulimit_v_()
do additional checking of setlocale() output with non "C" locales
(I notice locale(1) doesn't set the exit value appropriately upon failure :/),
and use that as additional space to add on top of the current adaptive method?

thanks!
Pádraig



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]