[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute
From: |
Ben Elliston |
Subject: |
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:07:42 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:42:07AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> FWIW, for now, I'm attempting to fix my testsuite by including a patched
> copy of host_execute, and simply removing the bogus line:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5531d1df2ab9f50c8be72271c6c74ed3757c79db
That seems a bit nasty (having a duplicated copy of host_execute) in
the long term. It seems to me that we should patch the DejaGnu version
as you've done?
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute,
Ben Elliston <=
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/14
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/12
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/12