[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] ideas on new features for future release
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] ideas on new features for future release |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:24:23 +0000 |
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 12:52 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I have a few ideas for future releases:
>
> Fingering sub-mode
> sub mode of insert or edit
> user hits a character "12345PIMA etc ..." and each denemo note
This sort of continuous entry is what I think we can and should do for
lyrics, chord symbols and figured basses. I need to split staffs from
voices first, and then sort out multiple accelerator maps (as the
keypresses will be going to the drawing area window).
> object gets a fingering assigned to it. Null values will not
> print a fingering. The cursor should advance to the next note
> after a char has been entered. Perhaps the fingerings will
> only be visible in fingering sub-mode. For guitar there would
> need to be both right and left hand fingerings for each note.
Can you give a short sample of LilyPond code showing what the output
would be? The output for a single two note chord at present looks like
this:
...
<a d'>4 \bar "|."
How do you add fingerings in LilyPond (three examples really - right,
left fingerings and Fret number indication)?
>
> Voice properties
> This would add properties to that voice. Property values could
> be stem direction, size (for separate secondary verse melodies)
This may come with what I have - again a sample LilyPond would be good.
>
> Slur support
?? We have both tie and Slur in Denemo at the moment. I have been
thinking that it might be nice to have some mouse modes, so that slurs
could be added by pointing and dragging between notes - rather like
adding slurs to a hand written copy.
>
> lilypond-book support
> This will allow the user to create small musical excerpts that
> are very small like one measure. Export options could then be
> png, svg, jpg, etc ...
I've not looked closely at that - once again if you can give a short
sample of the output we need.
>
>
> The above are the most frequent reasons why I have to open up the
> exported lilypond file after denemo.
Thanks for the feedback.
Richard