denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Denemo-devel] [bug #29399] Timesignature query in scheme


From: anonymous
Subject: [Denemo-devel] [bug #29399] Timesignature query in scheme
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:56:27 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #29399 (project denemo):

OK, thanks for this information.  
1.I'll update the Rebar script to use this command--unless I should consider
it deprecated and leave it til something better is written?  I.e., do you plan
to remove this "query=timesigname" stuff?
2.I suppose I should see if I can find this by digging around in the C like
you did, but... do you know if this is possible to get info on tuplets this
way?
3.Same as 2, but for grace notes: can we get in scheme whether a note is a
grace or not?  If there's an obvious way to do it I'm not aware of it.
With 2 and 3 come this caveat for the rebar:  As it stands now it will mess
up your score if you run it and there are tuplets or grace notes, since it
will read these as "face value" notes.
One final question:
4.What will be the "official" denemo way to do tuplets?  As I remember there
currently are the built-ins, and the standalone directives that just tell
lilypond that these are tuplets.  As far as I know the latter are unrecognized
by denemo in any way other than as miscellaneous directives, but are more
versatile due to being able to specify arbitrary factors such as times 4/7. 
So, a) do you expect the stand-alone tuplet directives will eventually have
midi support and be counted properly by denemo?  b) Will the built-ins still
be around or will they be phased out?  More to the point, which way should I
write the rebar script to deal with tuplets?  Or is it too early to worry
about?
Thanks,
Dan W.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?29399>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]