directory-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:04:34 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > These add-ons don't have a license copy in the root directory
  > * Adblock Plus - https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/6765
  > * NoScript - I recommended the author to add it

  > ¤¤¤
  > 1: Is it enough to add "|License note=" to them?

I don't know enough about this situation to reach a conclusion.
You've given me a scattering of facts in a field of unknowns.

You have showed me an example of some sort of data structure.
What data structure is that?  Who uses it?  Where and how?

I see other problems in what you did say.

  > |License=GPLv3

That is unclear.  How is that package licened?
gpl3.0-only, or gpl3.0-or-later?

Does Adblock Plus have copy of GPL 3 in it somewhere?


I think I should discuss this with Donald some time.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]