[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why not F/V and V/F Convertors ?!
From: |
Hermann Gausterer |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why not F/V and V/F Convertors ?! |
Date: |
Tue, 6 May 2003 13:52:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
hi saeed
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 04:33:46AM -0700, Saeed Beyty wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why we dont use Frequency to voltage (F/V) or Voltage
> to Frequency (V/f) converter devices/chips in the
> front-end section?
with this sort of demodulator you can of course demod
(= receive) FM signals (per definition), a F->V chip
is nothing more than a (simple) FM demod.
you CANNOT demod an even simpler AM signal, or
any of the nowerdays used modulationtypes like
QAM
for digital signals, you can demod. FSK signals
but no QPSK
> by this method there is no need to those expensive,
> high speed A/D converters to sampple the high
> frequency signals, nor the high speed CPUs to perform
> the time-comsuming FFT task.
but with this type of operation you can be sure, that
every new "narrow" band type of modulations is only
a software update away from working
i am open for any comments :-)
mfg hermann