[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC
From: |
Andy Green |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2003 17:08:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 16:58, Paul A. Scott wrote:
> > it was possible to transfer 20MBytes/sec like this with latencies
> > of under 2mS over USB2. It is this transfer rate which is the
> > limiting factor, not the conversion rates on the ADC or DACs.
Hi Paul -
> Why not use 400MB/sec IEEE 1394 (Firewire) instead?
Here is the reasoning:
- Firewire is less common than USB2, which is present on all new
motherboards
- While not wishing to be a troll, Firewire seems to be headed in the
opposite direction in terms of port availability
- Firewire is 400Mbits/sec, USB2 is nominally 480Mbits/sec. So
there is no advantage in wire speed to use Firewire. We found a
simple blocking IO setup delivered the ~20MBytes/sec performance I
mentioned, with <2mS latencies. So this is what we take as our
deliverable performance.
- Firewire device chips are less available and more expensive
These considerations make us settle on USB2.
- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+042YjKeDCxMJCTIRAjjfAJ0WOt+mKsGckYbkJaZ+NKbcUrcnsQCdE65Z
aQfMlHcBYdF8/p2GKsptjrE=
=cHvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Andy Green, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Paul A. Scott, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC,
Andy Green <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Joseph DiVerdi, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Henrique Miranda, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Joseph DiVerdi, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2 <-> fast ADC & DAC, Henrique Miranda, 2003/05/29