discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] "Failed to set initial frequency" andSDCC 2.5.0


From: Lee Patton
Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] "Failed to set initial frequency" andSDCC 2.5.0
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:14:18 -0400

Thanks Berndt! That was it. Very exciting.

Anyone have any ideas why I'm seeing that core dump when I do a File-
>Exit?


On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 10:31 +0930, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> You need the later usrp firmware which can be obtained from:
> 
> http://comsec.com/usrp/usrp_fpga_rev2_2005_10_24.rbf
> 
> cheerio Berndt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> Lee Patton
> Sent: Friday, 28 October 2005 10:15 AM
> To: Eric Blossom
> Cc: Discuss gnuradio
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "Failed to set initial frequency"
> andSDCC 2.5.0
> 
> 
> Eric -
> 
> I have the DBSRX board (800-2400 MHz) in the RXA slot.  The board seems
> to be recognized.  Here is what is printed out.
> 
> address@hidden usrp]# ./usrp_oscope.py -f 2000M
> RX d'board A: DBS Rx
> RX d'board B: <none>
> uOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuOuO
> glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x09aa9808 ***
> Abort (core dumped)
> 
> (Note: I get a core dump if I close the GUI window with File->Exit or
> just x-off the window. However, I don't get the core dump message if I
> CTRL-C in the shell.)
> 
> I tried entering the frequency in the text box and pressing enter, but I
> get the message "DDC: is invalid. Enter a float with optional scale
> suffix. E.g., 100.1M"
> 
> I'm not sure if the frequency I'm supposed to enter is the carrier I
> want to receive, the vco freq, or the DDC output freq. So, I tried the
> above w/ 100.1M, and got the same result.
> 
> I don't know if this is relevant, but I installed the usrp CVS code.
> After the install, I downloaded usrp-0.8.tar.gz from the gr downloads
> page, and did a
> 
> # cp usrb-0.8/fpga/rbf/usrp_fpga_rev2.rbf
> $GRHOME/share/usrp/rev2/usrp_fpga.rbf
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
>  - Lee
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 16:34 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:14:38PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> > > Hi all -
> > >
> > > I seem to have the baseline packages, gnuradio, and usrp code installed
> > > okay. The example files "usrp_oscope.py" and "usrp_fft.py" run and
> > > display active data on the line. However, I cannot set the frequency.
> > > The GUI displays the message "Failed to set initial frequency."
> >
> > Which daughterboard are you using?
> >
> > Usually "Failed to set initial frequency" is because either the
> > default or the command line argument is out of the range that the
> > daughterboard can successfully tune.  (The daughterboard's set_freq
> > method returned False.)
> >
> > If you've got more than one Rx daughterboard, are you specifying which
> > one you want to receive on using the -R {a,b} command line option?
> >
> > Have you tried changing the frequency by entering a number in the text
> > field and pressing enter?  To set 104.5 megahertz, enter "104.5M"
> > (without the quotes).  104.5m will try to set to 104.5 millihertz.
> > 104.5 wills to 104.5 hertz...
> >
> > On the command line, the same SI standard suffixes work.  M is
> > probably the one you want:  ... -f 104.5M
> >
> > > I originally installed SDCC 2.5.0, but after reading the USRP README, I
> > > installed SDCC 2.4.0. This did not fix the problem.  SDCC 2.4.0 won't
> > > compile *completely* under gcc 3.4 (which is why I used 2.5.0 in the
> > > first place), but it does (apparently) generate all the files required
> > > by gnuradio.  I say this because the example files run. I just can't set
> > > the frequency.
> > >
> > > My questions are:
> > >
> > > 1) Any idea how to fix the problem causing the "Failed to set init..."
> > > message?
> >
> > See above.
> >
> > > 2) Can SDCC 2.5.0 be used, or is 2.4.0 an absolute must?
> >
> > I haven't tested with SDCC 2.5.0.
> > 2.4.0 had some compiler bugs that I had to diagnose and work around.
> > I'm not sure if 2.5.0 is better or just different.  2.4.0 is known to
> > compile our code correctly.
> >
> > Looks like SDCC 2.4.0 fails to compile the AVR simulator under gcc
> > 3.4, but that doesn't matter to us, since we aren't using the
> > AVR microcontroller, or any simulator for that matter.
> >
> > Eric
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]