[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed
From: |
Achilleas Anastasopoulos |
Subject: |
[Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed |
Date: |
Fri, 12 May 2006 10:30:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
I have noticed a huge speed dissadvantage when comparing my
ANSI-C implementation of a Viterbi decoder with my Gnuradio
implementation. The core code is pretty much the same, except
that in the Gnuradio implementation I am using STL vectors.
It seems that Gnuradio is about 20 times SLOWER than ANSI-C!!!
I was wondering if this has to do with Gnuradio itself (buffering +
python + other fat), or with the fact that I had to translate all
my ANCI-C code to C++ and use STL.
Does anyone have similar experiences?
Achilleas
- [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed,
Achilleas Anastasopoulos <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Ilia Mirkin, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Ilia Mirkin, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, al davis, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Ilia Mirkin, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, John Aldridge, 2006/05/13
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed, Eric Blossom, 2006/05/13