[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Packaging GNU Radio for Fedora

From: Eric Blossom
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Packaging GNU Radio for Fedora
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:30:02 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:42:34PM +0100, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Eric Blossom <address@hidden>:
> >On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I creating a spec file for GNU Radio, and I discovered some minor issues:
> >>
> >> 1. Standard library paths are hardcoded into some of the libraries. I
> >> use this command in the spec file to fix libtool before building:
> >> sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
> >> libtool
> >> sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
> >
> >Just out of curiosity, how does _everybody_ else handle this problem?
> >I suspect that they're not editing libtool source.
> >
> >Please take a look at the .spec files for other applications built
> >with autotools.
> I am aware of that this solution looks a bit dirty, but it is actually
> taken from the packaging guidelines on the fedoraproject wiki:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544

Very good.  I guess they don't care for --rpath ;)

> The message reported by rpmbuild is not an error; it is possible to
> ignore it, but I wanted to do the right thing. Thats why I am asking.

Thanks for you efforts on this.  It'll be great to have an rpm.

> Trond Danielsen


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]