[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:19:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:17:19AM -0500, George Nychis wrote:
>
>>
>> I and Q are not on separate channels. They are interleaved, I0, Q0, I1,
>> Q1...
>>
>
> Are we sure of this? Based on Brian's pointer to here:
> http://gnuradio.org/trac/browser/gnuradio/branches/features/inband-usb/usrp/fpga/toplevel/usrp_inband_usb/usrp_inband_usb.v#L235
>
> ... it seems as though they are wired to separate channels. We then use
> them as inputs to rx_buffer_input here:
> http://gnuradio.org/trac/browser/gnuradio/branches/features/inband-usb/usrp/fpga/toplevel/usrp_inband_usb/usrp_inband_usb.v#L260
>
> ... but only ever read from channel 0 (I).
>
> Is there a module we are missing that interleaves them?
>
> - George
Sorry George, I misunderstood which definition of "channel" you were
using. Yes, in the legacy code they come from separate channels, but
those channels are paired and interleaved to define a "channel" as
seen by the host code.
Eric
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, Brian Padalino, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, George Nychis, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, Brian Padalino, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, George Nychis, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, George Nychis, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, Brian Padalino, 2007/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, George Nychis, 2007/12/16
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I&Q on same or separate channels?, Eric Blossom, 2007/12/14