[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gsm gmsk demodulation
From: |
isaacgerg |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gsm gmsk demodulation |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT) |
My question to all of you responding on this question then is: How do I
convert the amplitudes of my GMSK signal to probabilities for viterbi based
demodulation?
Isaac
Steven Clark-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:45 AM, isaacgerg <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Concerning GSM GMSK demodulation, due to the ISI, I initially thought
>> many
>> folks were using the Viterbi algorithm on the waveform to demodulate it
>> properly. After doing some lit review, I am finding that this is not the
>> case and that when most folks talk about Viterbi concerning GSM GMSK
>> demodulation, they are referring to undoing the convolution encoding and
>> not
>> referring to demodultion in the face of ISI. Can anyone please confirm
>> this?
>>
>> I see many demodulators simply just ignoring the ISI and just
>> demodulating
>> as if it wasnt present. It seems they just rely on the convolutional
>> encoding for error correction and therefore dont need to worry about the
>> ISI......Is this true?
>
> What you have said is true in my experience as well. More often than
> not, Viterbi decoding is just used as part of the forward error
> correction scheme.
>
> Please look for my next email to the mailing list for an alternate
> GMSK demodulator that reduces ISI...
>
> -Steven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/gsm-gmsk-demodulation-tp17667993p17731307.html
Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gsm gmsk demodulation,
isaacgerg <=