discuss-gnuradio
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
From
:
Newell Jensen
Subject
:
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
Date
:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:13:42 -0700
My bad. Thanks for the explanation...I had been reading about the Microblaze compilers and just assumed (what not to do before you hit the list).
--
Newell
http://www.gempillar.com
Before enlightenment: chop wood, carry water
After enlightenment: code, build circuits
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
[Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
,
Newell Jensen
,
2008/10/20
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
,
Johnathan Corgan
,
2008/10/20
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
,
Matt Ettus
,
2008/10/20
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
,
Newell Jensen
<=
Prev by Date:
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
Next by Date:
[Discuss-gnuradio] Signal processing and GPU
Previous by thread:
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Microblaze? Why not OpenRISC
Next by thread:
[Discuss-gnuradio] Signal processing and GPU
Index(es):
Date
Thread