discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP with USB/IP


From: Stefan Bruens
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP with USB/IP
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:52:22 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.27.21-0.1-default; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; )

On Saturday 06 June 2009 00:23:54 Alberto Trentadue wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 12:14 -0700, Firas Abbas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Patrick Strasser <patrick.
>
> address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > ednet[1] and RaidSonic[2] sell boxes that can forward USB
> > > ports over
>
> via the Linux USB/IP[3] system.
>
> > > Patrick
> >
> > From the web site the transfer rate of these boxes is
>
> 10/100Mb/s. So theoretically it should transfer a maximum of 12.5MByte/sec
> which is far below the required 32Mbyte/sec of USRP1.
>
> Hello Firas.
> Just for my understanding:
> The 32Mbyte/s requirement is for a full speed - 4 channel USRP
> operation.
> But if we suppose a simpler application, e.g. 1 TX/RX channel only,
> wouldn't this fit in the USB/IP?

This still on the decimation/interpolation rate. Each complex sample is 4 
byte. Theoretically 100MBit Ethernet could sustain 3 MSample/s, so the 
decimation rate has to be 22 or higher (most probably substantially higher, as 
there is some overhead by the TCP(UDP?)/IP headers, but 32 (2MSample) should 
be fine).

As Ethernet is full duplex, this is the number of samples/s that can be  
sustained per direction, in constrast to USB, where the bandwidth is shared.

This will for sure add some latency, you will have to figure this out by 
yourself.

Bottom Line: 1TX/1RX, 2 MSample/s, complex samples should be possible.

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Brüns  /  Bergstraße 21  /  52062 Aachen
phone: +49 241 53809034     mobile: +49 151 50412019




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]