[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: interfacing a DSP array card to USRP2
From: |
Jeff Brower |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: interfacing a DSP array card to USRP2 |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:23:20 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.2-1 |
Matt-
>> About Vikram's 10/100 mode question, we were wondering if it's a design
>> flaw; i.e. something wrong from the start in
>> the original opencores.org source, or if it's fixable but hasn't been a high
>> priority item given USRP2's high data
>> rate requirements. But then I found this post:
>>
>> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/143084
>>
>> So I guess the former. If there are any hints you can give on what's wrong,
>> we can take a look. Maybe our guys can
>> get it working.
>
>
> Eventually I got completely fed up with the opencores gige core and
> wrote a completely new one from scratch (the simple_gemac). It only
> does gigabit, though.
Ok.
> One of the main problems with 10/100/1000 in a spartan is that you need
> a large number of clocks and the S3 is constrained.
My understanding is that it takes 3 BUFGs and one DCM for tri-mode (maybe one
more of each for RGMII support but I
don't see that) and, between this and other USRP2 needs, you ran into the limit
of 8. Is that accurate? Or would
10/100/1000 support would take more than 3...
> If you just want
> 10/100 and can live without gigabit, I would suggest doing that, as it
> will save 1 or 2 clocks.
Ok... maybe we can implement both modes if we're careful.
-Jeff
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: interfacing a DSP array card to USRP2, Matt Ettus, 2010/04/08
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: interfacing a DSP array card to USRP2, Vikram Ragukumar, 2010/04/09
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: interfacing a DSP array card to USRP2, Vikram Ragukumar, 2010/04/12