discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] output 0 is not connected internally


From: Tom Rondeau
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] output 0 is not connected internally
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:24:31 -0500

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Brad Hein <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Tom Rondeau <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Brad Hein <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm endeavouring to get gnuradio+grc working in Fedora 14 on my i386
>> > computers. I've tried two now, and I'm plagued with the same problems -
>> > they
>> > just won't execute.
>> >
>> > I suspect there's a problem which went undetected, maybe a python file
>> > version mismatch or some other inconsistency. I'm trying hard to isolate
>> > the
>> > source of the problem.
>> >
>> > I also wrote a very basic grc which consisted of a sound source and
>> > attached
>> > it to different sinks (audio sync / waterfall sink / scope sink) - each
>> > producing the same error shown below, when executed.
>> >
>> > I'm trying different things, but any input would be greatly appreciated
>> > =)
>>
>> Looking at your version information below, you're running a very old
>> version of the GNU Radio Companion (grc 0.70). You'll need to update
>> it, which I think will solve your problem. I actually don't know if we
>> have a newer package of GRC out there, so you might have to
>> compile/install it yourself (Josh, let me know if I'm wrong about
>> this).
>>
>
>
> Thank you for pointing that out! I went ahead and obtained gnuradio 3.3.0
> (sourcecode) and I'm setting up my "faster" Fedora PC to compile it.
>
> If this works, I suppose I should share the procedure with Fedora so they
> can make the necessary changes to the F14 repo so that others can have a
> working configuration without the need for compiling.
>
> BH


There has been work on an RPM for Fedora 14, but the spec file doesn't
include GRC.

In general, though, we need to be better about keeping these guys up to date.

Thanks,
Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]