discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss-gnuradio] Real-only direct-conversion


From: Marcus D. Leech
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Real-only direct-conversion
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:28:41 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10

I was on a call the other night with someone who asserted that you
didn't need an I & Q representation
  for  a direct-conversion receiver, and that I and Q could be
synthesized later from a real-mode-only
  baseband signal.

I know that very-early (1940s) direct-conversion receivers didn't use I
and Q signal chains, but they were
  typically used for demodulating AM signals, where the +/- frequency
ambiguity wouldn't have been
  an issue.

So, my feeling is that you *absolutely need* the I and Q "form" in order
to disambiguate +/-
  frequencies when dealing with direct-conversion baseband signals.

Who's right?

-- 
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]