[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss-gnuradio] Real-only direct-conversion
From: |
Marcus D. Leech |
Subject: |
[Discuss-gnuradio] Real-only direct-conversion |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:28:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10 |
I was on a call the other night with someone who asserted that you
didn't need an I & Q representation
for a direct-conversion receiver, and that I and Q could be
synthesized later from a real-mode-only
baseband signal.
I know that very-early (1940s) direct-conversion receivers didn't use I
and Q signal chains, but they were
typically used for demodulating AM signals, where the +/- frequency
ambiguity wouldn't have been
an issue.
So, my feeling is that you *absolutely need* the I and Q "form" in order
to disambiguate +/-
frequencies when dealing with direct-conversion baseband signals.
Who's right?
--
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Real-only direct-conversion,
Marcus D. Leech <=