discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP output power


From: Marcus D. Leech
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP output power
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:13:34 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9

On 25/04/2011 11:42 AM, Nick Foster wrote:

The USRP does not have a calibrated output or input and you will have to
calibrate it using a measuring receiver, calibrated signal generator, or
power meter in order to obtain meaningful results.

--n

I don't think precise values are really required here. The typical Eb/N0 estimates are just that, *estimates*.

Let's assume that those bits leave the transmitter at "full-power" (+20dBm), and radiate isotropically through free-space, until they get to the receiver. At the receiver, the signal is received against a locally-generated noise-background of some magnitude. I think the noise figure of the RFX2400 is in the neighbourhood of 5-6dB at maximum gain. A noise figure of 3dB is equivalent to a noise power of -174dBm/Hz of bandwidth, so let's call the noise power at the receiver -170dBm/Hz to
  make the math easier.

Now, what is the equivalent bandwidth of each bit? Let's say it's 10KHz for argument's sake. That means that the receiver noise power over the bandwidth of a bit is -170dBm/Hz + 40dBHz = -130dBm of noise power at the receiver over the bandwidth
  occupied by our theoretical 10KHz bit.

The signal itself leaves the transmitter, and suffers free-space path loss in a roughly inverse-cube law. Over a 1M path, that signal suffers (assuming a perfectly-isotropic transmit antenna at 2.4GHz) a path loss of about 40dB, which brings the received signal down to about -20dBm. So that -20dBm is set "against" a receiver noise over the same bandwidth of -130dBm. The calculation of
  the linear-units EB/N0 is left as an exercise for the reader.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]