discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU radio


From: Matt Ettus
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU radio
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:29:08 -0700


USRP N210 and SBX transceiver will give you coverage of all those bands.

Matt

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Rich <address@hidden> wrote:
Maybe I can list my aims and you can tell me if GNU and N200 can do this ?

1. Receive on 1030 MHz - BW not sure yet
2. Receive on 1090 MHz - BW not sure yet
3. Receive on 2700 - 2900 MHz - BW not sure yet
4. Classify signals on these bands.
5. Perform PPM decode - Pulse Position Decode on the 1090 MHz band

Using a hardware device and GNU radio

The computer would be a MAC MINI running openSUSE LINUX

or

MacBook PRO Laptop running LINUX

with either USB or Gigabit ethernet.

What would be the suggested software and hardware combinations ?

Can I use the N200 as a very basic spectrum analyser and a capture device ( I guess the capture device would be just continuous)

I undestand what I want to do and I have started decoding singals on 1090 MHz already

I just want to turbo charge the process and make it as fast as my Mode S 1090 MHz receiver I have now, which is a 1090 MHz front end and FPGA


- Andrew -

----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus D. Leech" <address@hidden>
To: "Andrew Rich" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: GNU radio


On 21/09/2011 11:34 AM, Andrew Rich wrote:
I was just looking at the N200

Do these hardware components have sensitivity figures ?
That depends entirely on the daughterboard you chose.  Although most of them have noise figures in the 4-5dB range at maximum gain.
 If you're just interested in RX in the 1090MHz range, I'd suggest the DBS_RX2.  Sensitivity is dominated by noise figure.  If you need
 lower noise figures you'll have to put a band-specific LNA in front, which is what I do for radio astronomy.


I am interested in passive RADAR

I have been using a 1090 MHz receiver and a cheap digital OSCilloscope commaned under LINUX as a capture device.

I guess that is sort of what the hardware and software of an SDR does ?

My system is very slow

In an SDR, nearly-all the processing is done on the host computer, so you need a fastish computer.  Overall compute requirements
 are roughly proportional to sample_rate * complexity-per-sample.









_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]