|
On 03/12/2013 11:24 AM, Tom Rondeau
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Martin Braun (CEL)
<address@hidden> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Tom Rondeau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Sean Nowlan
<address@hidden> wrote:
I've noticed that gr-modtool keeps FSF's copyright assignment for a lot of
boilerplate (CMakeLists.txt, QA code, etc.) but puts a hook for the end
user's copyright statement in block source files. Is this a pretty standard
way of doing things?
Yes, pretty much. Of course, this is just my understanding of how
copyright of works is handled, and obviously IAMAL.
I assume you meant 'IANAL'. It kind of reads the opposite way :)
MB
Yeah, typo....
Tom
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
With the understanding that I will *not* take any answers as
*actual* legal advice, is it generally reasonable to say:
1) If I copy a gnuradio block (copyright FSF), tweak a few things,
and redistribute, FSF retains copyright and I have no copyright to
the changes
2) If I build a block from the ground up, it's still GPLv3 since it
depends on gnuradio, but I may either maintain copyright or assign
it to FSF
--sean
|