[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.7.2.1 on OSX 10.8.5
From: |
Michael Dickens |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.7.2.1 on OSX 10.8.5 |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:27:26 -0500 |
Hi Ed - Thanks for the kind words! All of the warnings you show are normal for
OSX 10.8 or 10.9 and GNU Radio release in MacPorts. If you move to
gnuradio-devel, you'll be able to get rid of the "failed to XInitThreads()"
warning; if you move to 10.9, you'll get even more warnings if/when you run
anything that uses WX. All of the warnings are normal and nothing to be
concerned about. - MLD
On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:37 PM, Ed Criscuolo <address@hidden> wrote:
> I just upgraded my ports-installed version of GR 3.6.3 to
> GR 3.7.2.1 with a simple "port upgrade gnuradio".
> The install went smoothly without errors and installed
> a working copy of 3.7.2.1 with only a few operational
> issues.
>
> Hats off to Michael Dickens for his superb job of supporting
> GnuRadio on OSX!! :)
>
> Michael,
>
> I got the following when starting gnuradio-companion:
>
> ===================
> ** (process:51809): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GMountMountFlags'
> as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'
>
> ** (process:51809): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GDriveStartFlags'
> as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'
>
> ** (process:51809): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GSocketMsgFlags' as
> enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'
> Warning: Block key "blocks_ctrlport_monitor_performance" not found when
> loading category tree.
> Warning: Block key "blocks_ctrlport_monitor_performance" not found when
> loading category tree.
> Mac OS; Clang version 4.1 ((tags/Apple/clang-421.11.66)); Boost_105500;
> UHD_003.007.000-0-unknown
>
> <<< Welcome to GNU Radio Companion 3.7.2.1 >>>
> ===================
>
> Also, when I run a flowgraph, I see this in the output:
>
> ===================
> Executing: "/Users/edwardc/Work/gnu_radio/DAS_Test_01.py"
>
> Warning: failed to XInitThreads()
> Using Volk machine: sse4_1_64_orc
> ===================
>
> Are either of these significant?