[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Post Binary Slicer question
From: |
Andre Puschmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Post Binary Slicer question |
Date: |
Fri, 02 May 2014 14:46:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
Hi,
By chance I am also working on an OOT module for a CC1100-based device.
I started out with a Python version as Michael also suggested, but now I
am migrating it to C++. I actually plan working on it during the EU
Hackfest next week in Karlsruhe.
John, Jay, perhaps we can create a single module for this as those chips
are very similar, something like gr-cc110x perhaps.
Cheers,
Andre
On 30.04.2014 18:15, John Malsbury wrote:
> Jay,
>
> As it turns out I am working on an out-of-tree module to work with the
> CC1101, which I think I'll be able to release. The number of possible
> formats for the frame are relatively few if you know they are using CRC
> and you know the packets aren't fixed length. (use_sequence_number?,
> use_address_field?). By definition, we know there will be length field
> since these are not fixed length packets. It would probably just make
> sense to test the handful of options until CRC passes.
>
> Of course, this changes if the device isn't taking advantage of CC1101s
> packet handling functionality, and instead the MCU is providing more
> than just the "payload". In such a case, there is potentially larger
> feature space for the frame.
>
> I'll let you know about the CC1101 OOT.
>
> -John
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Jay Radcliffe <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Maybe I should rephrase: I don't know the entire protocol. I know
> there is a preamble, and I know the sync word. I know the packets
> are not fixed length, I know there is a CRC. This can all be
> determined from looking at the register settings for the CC1101
> chip. The format of the data portion of transmission I do not know.
> In order to reverse that I need raw data for analysis.
>
> That is how I am handling it right now. I stream the output of the
> Correlate Access Code to a file sink. What is in that file though
> is data, not readable binary stream (or readable hex stream). What I
> want is tcpdump like output.
>
> Jay Radcliffe
> Twitter: @jradcliffe02
> E-Mail: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> LinkedIn + Resume: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jradcliffe02
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:09 AM, John Malsbury
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Jay,
>
> If you stream the output of the correlate access code to file,
> and you leave them unpacked, Bit 1 being set will show where the
> sync word is (I think the bit after). Of course Bit 0 will be
> the data. This assumes you're using correlate access code, and
> not "correlate access code - tag". This should allow you to
> store everything including the preamble.
>
> Also, if you don't know the protocol, how do you know what the
> preamble is?
>
> -John
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jay Radcliffe
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> The protocol is unknown at this time. I need to see the
> packets to figure some of this out.
>
> Ideally, I would like to see the entire packet (including
> the preamble and sync word) to start to work my way to the
> format of the packets from there. I am using the power
> squelch with the gate to limit the captures to just when a
> signal is over a certain strength. In a perfect world, I
> would like to have "Binary Slicer" -> "File Sink" where the
> file contents are the binary stream (10101010101010 not to
> be confused for a binary file) or hex output (0xAA 0xAA). I
> could probably tag the preamble in with the Correlate Access
> Code?
>
> Jay Radcliffe
> Twitter: @jradcliffe02
> E-Mail: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> LinkedIn + Resume: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jradcliffe02
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:28 PM, John Malsbury
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
> Jay,
>
> Thanks for the inquiry. Is there a specific protocol or
> format you are trying to work with? Are the frame size
> fixed in length or variable? The answers to these
> questions will dictate whether you can use an existing
> block or if you will need to write your own.
>
> Writing a block to parse things after the correlate
> access code block is relatively straight-forward. If
> you are using the (tag) version of that block, you
> simply need to look for the presence of that tag to
> delineate the start of a frame.
>
> -John
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Jay Radcliffe
> <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> I have a question about handling data after binary
> slicing in the demodulation portion of handling a
> signal. Currently I am taking that data and pushing
> it through the Correlate Access Code block then into
> a file sink. This produces a data file. I didn't
> know if someone could tell me a block or method that
> will output the binary stream (or hex stream) to a
> file or stdout for real-time view of the pack
> contents. Currently I have some python code that
> converts that data file into binary/hex which is not
> idea.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
>
>
> Jay Radcliffe
> Twitter: @jradcliffe02
> E-Mail: address@hidden
>
> <https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&address@hidden>
> LinkedIn + Resume:
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jradcliffe02
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Post Binary Slicer question,
Andre Puschmann <=