discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss-gnuradio] Slow down rate of Python source block


From: David Halls
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Slow down rate of Python source block
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:21:01 +0000

Dear All,

I have a Python block that produces packets of size 1536 bytes. Due to various reasons, the latter parts of my flow graph are very slow (this is desired and cannot be changed). After producing 510 packets, I get the following error.

"handler caught exception: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (1527) (1536)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/gr/gateway.py", line 55, in eval
try: self._callback()
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/gr/gateway.py", line 160, in __gr_block_handle
) for i in self.__out_indexes],
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/trl/blsd_enc_b.py", line 198, in work
out_cA[0:len(cAm)] = cAm
ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (1527) (1536)
thread[thread-per-block[1]: <block blsd_enc_b (2)>]: caught unrecognized exception"

Debugging more carefully, I can see that:

len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 32768

for the first 490 packets, and then the length of 'out_cA' begins to reduce

packet_num = 490
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 32247
packet_num = 491
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 30711
packet_num = 492
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 29175
packet_num = 493
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 27639
packet_num = 494
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 26103
packet_num = 495
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 24567
packet_num = 496
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 23031
packet_num = 497
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 21495
packet_num = 498
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 19959
packet_num = 499
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 18423
packet_num = 500
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 16887
packet_num = 501
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 15351
packet_num = 502
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 13815
packet_num = 503
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 12279
packet_num = 504
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 10743
packet_num = 505
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 9207
packet_num = 506
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 7671
packet_num = 507
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 6135
packet_num = 508
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 4599
packet_num = 509
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 3063
packet_num = 510
len(cAm) = 1536 , len(out_cA) = 1527

I believe this is because the latter parts of the flow graph are blocking, their buffers become full, and this backs up to my source block. This is confirmed by connecting my source block to null sinks, which then allows the source block to run infinitely (well, a long while!).

Is there a way I can slow up this block? I tried using a throttle on the output, but this doesn't help (in fact it seems to make it worse!).

The full code of the block is attached.

Thanks!

David

________________________________

NOTE: The information in this email and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. This message may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your system and notify the sender immediately.

Toshiba Research Europe Limited, registered in England and Wales (2519556). Registered Office 208 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0GZ, England. Web: www.toshiba.eu/research/trl



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com

Attachment: blsd_enc_b.py
Description: blsd_enc_b.py


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]