discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about reverse-engineering a new mode


From: Andrew Clegg
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about reverse-engineering a new mode
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:31:53 -0400

Sounds like an interesting project. I'd like to know more about the spectrum aspect -- do you know which band segments in 700 MHz are used for this in the U.S.? Me and my spectrum analyzer want to know :)

Andy


Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 06:28:44 -0700
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about reverse-engineering a new mode


On 26 May 2015 03:28, "Robert McGwier" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> [...]
> That said, hackers (the good definition) live for this, and I encourage it.

Just wanted to emphasise this. Go for it! Worst case, you learn a lot of interesting things.

Cheers,
M

>
> Bob
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Mark Haun <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> This is a bit of an idle question, but I'm hoping some knowledgable folks on
>> here can offer advice.  Mostly I'm trying to understand better what I
>> don't know, and the size of the challenge, before jumping in to a project:
>>
>> I'd like to try decoding some AVL traffic in the 700-MHz band (GPS locations
>> broadcast by transit vehicles to a central collector, where predictors are
>> used to generate the ETAs displayed on electronic bus-stop signs).  The
>> modulation is 4-FSK, similar to P25 except wider with a higher symbol rate,
>> emission designator 20K0F1D.  The particular frequency(s) should be easy
>> enough to discover.  Transmissions are short packets on shared channels with
>> some kind of slotted aloha or CSMA MAC.  A rate-3/4 convolutional code is
>> used.  The preceding is public information gleaned from the web.  I haven't
>> captured any signals yet.
>>
>> The known unknowns:  preambles and framing stuff, symbol mapping,
>> the particular rate-3/4 code used (only a couple of candidates though), and,
>> the scrambler (whitener) and its initialization.  AFAIK there is no
>> encryption per se.  The payload is supposed to be TCP/IP, so there could be
>> some sort of header compression.
>>
>> My question, then, is given this information, are there reasonable odds of
>> success?  I have some digital comms background from grad school but little
>> to no practical experience.  Wondering if this might be an excuse to pick up
>> a HackRF etc. and learn GNU Radio, or if it's likely to be a dead end.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob McGwier
> Co-Founder and Technical Director, Federated Wireless, LLC
> Research Professor Virginia Tech
> Senior Member IEEE, Facebook: N4HYBob, ARS: N4HY
> Faculty Advisor Virginia Tech Amateur Radio Assn. (K4KDJ)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>


_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]